Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition

analyzed 2026-08-17 · sample of 429 English reviews across the whole review history

Players consistently praise the core experience. Gameplay is called "excellent game and gameplay," and the remaster "looks better than the original." The sheer volume of content is a recurring highlight, with reviewers noting the "abundance of single player content" and the inclusion of all expansions plus new campaigns. The price is seen as fair, the soundtrack is "a huge draw," and the community is described as "great and friendly online community." Many also point to the game's lasting pull, saying "I keep coming back to this game." Criticism is more scattered but real. Stability is the clearest sore spot, with players reporting random crashes and one describing an update that "left it unable to start." Bugs and multiplayer lag also come up, as does frustration with DLC, specifically "there is no option to exclude the latest 3 or 4 DLC packages/latest 12 civs from your gameplay." Opinion splits on the AI, with equal numbers praising the improved challenge and complaining about pathing or behavior. Difficulty and learning curve also divide reviewers, some finding it "more accessible than ever" while others feel even hard mode offers little challenge. The overall picture is a beloved classic with strong fundamentals, generous content, and active developer support, tempered by occasional technical instability and a few divisive design choices.

quotes copied verbatim from reviews · plain text is the language model's own wording

Aspects

share of sample, axis to 20% · ± is the sampling uncertainty around each share

  • positive
  • mixed / neutral
  • negative
  • gameplay

    68 positive · 2 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • Yep, it's still got it.
      positive · Oct 31, 2021 · review 101997754
    • but still an excellent game and gameplay
      positive · Nov 30, 2021 · review 104904032
    • feels the same, as it should.
      positive · Nov 30, 2021 · review 104910269
  • graphics

    41 positive · 1 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • looks better than the original.
      positive · Nov 30, 2021 · review 104910269
    • good for nostalgia, i remember playing this game in the 2000s, and with the graphics upgrade it is really nice
      positive · Jul 31, 2022 · review 119846171
    • Have been playing this game as a kid and always wanted since then for the graphics to be updated.
      positive · Apr 30, 2023 · review 137584394
  • content amount

    27 positive · 2 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • Nevertheless, the gameplay is solid and there's a lot of content.
      positive · Feb 28, 2022 · review 111265479
    • Classical RTS with an abundance of single player content for nostalgic players.
      positive · Aug 31, 2023 · review 145407493
    • Great game, a lot of scenarios to work with.
      positive · May 31, 2024 · review 166425362
  • multiplayer

    20 positive · 3 negative · 0 mixed · 2 neutral

    • This game has destroyed my life by an all consuming need to destroy my friends in Empirical CONQUEST!
      positive · May 31, 2022 · review 116309774
    • great game, especially for those that enjoy strategy; great group game as well
      positive · Jun 30, 2022 · review 117953617
    • Like the gameplay, stategies and playing with a friend a game that i enjoyed 10+ years ago
      positive · Aug 31, 2022 · review 121540631
  • updates

    13 positive · 4 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • Many thanks to the developers for keeping the game alive for more than 20 years with regular updates and events.
      positive · Jun 30, 2023 · review 141006163
    • Updates were extremly good for aoe2 de.
      positive · Jun 30, 2023 · review 141006997
    • Phenomenal games with active update from dev.
      positive · Oct 31, 2023 · review 149276897
  • ai behavior

    5 positive · 5 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • The only downside to fighting AI is the huge skill curve from Moderate to Hard AI.
      negative · May 31, 2022 · review 116309774
    • New pathfinding problems that didn't exist in the original, poor squad mechanics, lack of cinematics that existed in the original, removed/modified difficulties and maps, and an AI with higher APM than the best Starcraft players with precision and screenreading tactics.
      negative · Sep 30, 2025 · review 205577065
    • While the Boars are very loud, swords can be deafening, and the ai occasionally locks up when you give too many orders; there's a single button to continuously reseed farms and fish traps.
      negative · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58818041
  • price value

    10 positive · 0 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • Worth every penny
      positive · Dec 31, 2022 · review 129814025
    • Classic game, worth the $, we all know who did 9/11
      positive · Apr 30, 2025 · review 193932564
    • Worth every penny and the gameplay is still fun since the day it came out.
      positive · Nov 30, 2025 · review 212188134
  • replayability

    8 positive · 1 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • I keep coming back to this game, oven and over again.
      positive · Nov 30, 2021 · review 104910132
    • Don't be discouraged by the negative opinions, even a decade later it's still a classic.
      positive · May 31, 2025 · review 196100280
    • I've been playing this game for over 20 years now and I learn something new every time I get on.
      positive · Nov 30, 2025 · review 212188860
  • stability

    2 positive · 6 negative · 1 mixed · 0 neutral

    • The broken update from almost two months ago left it unable to start.
      negative · Jul 31, 2026 · review 231775386
    • Despite some minor launch problems, this game is truly Age of Empires envisioned as a modern RTS.
      negative · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58808640
    • Also, multiplayer and crash issues persist despite being a focus of the development team.
      negative · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58809601
  • community

    8 positive · 0 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • This game is amazing and even though it is old the playerbase is active and it's more fun than games coming out now!
      positive · Jan 31, 2022 · review 109209843
    • Also, great and friendly online community.
      positive · Apr 30, 2023 · review 137582242
    • There is a very active community with this and so much nostalgia for me here
      positive · May 31, 2023 · review 139334184
see more
  • developer conduct

    4 positive · 4 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • Many thanks to the developers for keeping the game alive for more than 20 years with regular updates and events.
      positive · Jun 30, 2023 · review 141006163
    • There have been a few bumps, but the team is very responsive to criticism and patches often.
      positive · Jan 31, 2020 · review 62758703
    • The remake is not only just as good as I remember, it is now BETTER than I remember, because of a very diligent dev team, actively working on balance and on improving various game features.
      positive · Feb 29, 2020 · review 64324683
  • bugs

    1 positive · 6 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • good game but has a ton of bugs, more bugs than an indie unity game
      negative · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58808620
    • One thing I see is that this game still has several issues, but with their regular updates I have a feeling they will fix them
      negative · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58808991
    • Not only that, but there are also new scenario editor features, some of which are buggy right now but with the promise of many features being patched in (such as triggers to change train/research locations).
      negative · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58815267
  • difficulty

    3 positive · 3 negative · 0 mixed · 1 neutral

    • Even in hard you wont sweat or think anything.
      negative · Oct 31, 2023 · review 149278419
    • i suck at it though
      negative · Aug 31, 2024 · review 173938392
    • New pathfinding problems that didn't exist in the original, poor squad mechanics, lack of cinematics that existed in the original, removed/modified difficulties and maps, and an AI with higher APM than the best Starcraft players with precision and screenreading tactics.
      negative · Sep 30, 2025 · review 205577065
  • learning curve

    3 positive · 3 negative · 0 mixed · 1 neutral

    • The new graphics manage to capture the charm of the original game while giving it a more modern look, and many QoL improvements make it more accessible than ever to the returning or brand-new player.
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58809601
    • With a new mini-campaign teaching strategies for multiplayer and a way to download mods while in-game, it's probably never been easier to get started in AoE2.
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58815267
    • A great introduction to RTS's too, since a lot of the difficult micromanaging that would deter new players is now irrelevant since ques are now easier to manage
      positive · Dec 31, 2019 · review 61009289
  • addictiveness

    6 positive · 0 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • You can play this game for hours.
      positive · Feb 28, 2026 · review 219482400
    • Very addictive game.
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58813231
    • Its predecessors, and it's successors (1, 3 & 4), none of them get even close to how addictive is Age of Empires 2.
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58813313
  • music

    6 positive · 0 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • The best RTS game for me, good music and gameplay, my childhood fr.
      positive · Dec 31, 2022 · review 129813796
    • Gorgeous visuals, amazing soundtrack, the new animations look beautiful.
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58808640
    • Krásný remaster Soundtracku, grafika, Quality of Life vylepšení a další, dělají z téhle hry pro fanoušky AOE série nutnost!
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58811108
  • ui

    3 positive · 2 negative · 1 mixed · 0 neutral

    • Not only can it run on modern PCs like HD, but now it shows villager/gatherer totals as part of the UI and allows for automatic farm/fishing trap reseeding.
      positive · Nov 30, 2019 · review 58815267
    • Solid upgrade from the original, cool new animations and riddled with awesome QOL upgrades.
      positive · Feb 29, 2020 · review 64320273
    • with better UI / graphics, yeah !
      positive · Jun 30, 2020 · review 71762357
  • dlc

    2 positive · 3 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • [*]DLC contents are... questionable?
      negative · Aug 31, 2023 · review 145408809
    • Most of all, there is no option to exclude the latest 3 or 4 DLC packages/latest 12 civs from your gameplay, as in, block those civs for ranked play or easily block those for everyone for a game in the lobby.
      negative · Jun 30, 2026 · review 229278759
    • sucks that the new expasion wasnt compatible with the old AoE2 HD edition, but this version is way prettier.
      negative · Jan 31, 2021 · review 85720321
  • servers netcode

    2 positive · 3 negative · 0 mixed · 0 neutral

    • There is a huge lag in multiplayer games, the game doesn't accept any commands or accepts it 2 minutes later.
      negative · Jan 31, 2020 · review 62755746
    • The only negative aspect is that the multiplayer ♥♥♥♥♥ the bed for an hour or two every other patch.
      negative · Apr 30, 2020 · review 68323236
    • the server sucks, never improve with the disconnect problem.
      negative · Sep 30, 2020 · review 76827148

Review timeline

monthly peak 14,398 reviews · all languages

review volume 5,000 10,000 0 positive review share 100% 50% 0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Nov 2019 · 14,398 reviews (13,334 up · 1,064 down) · 93% positive Dec 2019 · 6,830 reviews (6,309 up · 521 down) · 92% positive Jan 2020 · 4,003 reviews (3,661 up · 342 down) · 91% positive Feb 2020 · 3,455 reviews (3,228 up · 227 down) · 93% positive Mar 2020 · 3,720 reviews (3,361 up · 359 down) · 90% positive Apr 2020 · 4,680 reviews (4,376 up · 304 down) · 94% positive May 2020 · 3,543 reviews (3,326 up · 217 down) · 94% positive Jun 2020 · 2,350 reviews (2,208 up · 142 down) · 94% positive Jul 2020 · 2,994 reviews (2,869 up · 125 down) · 96% positive Aug 2020 · 1,990 reviews (1,935 up · 55 down) · 97% positive Sep 2020 · 1,828 reviews (1,754 up · 74 down) · 96% positive Oct 2020 · 1,869 reviews (1,818 up · 51 down) · 97% positive Nov 2020 · 3,575 reviews (3,458 up · 117 down) · 97% positive Dec 2020 · 3,047 reviews (2,949 up · 98 down) · 97% positive Jan 2021 · 3,432 reviews (3,287 up · 145 down) · 96% positive Feb 2021 · 2,399 reviews (2,255 up · 144 down) · 94% positive Mar 2021 · 2,030 reviews (1,914 up · 116 down) · 94% positive Apr 2021 · 2,454 reviews (2,314 up · 140 down) · 94% positive May 2021 · 1,808 reviews (1,740 up · 68 down) · 96% positive Jun 2021 · 1,760 reviews (1,689 up · 71 down) · 96% positive Jul 2021 · 2,048 reviews (1,933 up · 115 down) · 94% positive Aug 2021 · 2,090 reviews (1,970 up · 120 down) · 94% positive Sep 2021 · 1,716 reviews (1,625 up · 91 down) · 95% positive Oct 2021 · 1,994 reviews (1,865 up · 129 down) · 94% positive Nov 2021 · 2,662 reviews (2,579 up · 83 down) · 97% positive Dec 2021 · 1,625 reviews (1,562 up · 63 down) · 96% positive Jan 2022 · 1,842 reviews (1,758 up · 84 down) · 95% positive Feb 2022 · 1,525 reviews (1,445 up · 80 down) · 95% positive Mar 2022 · 1,222 reviews (1,177 up · 45 down) · 96% positive Apr 2022 · 1,869 reviews (1,794 up · 75 down) · 96% positive May 2022 · 1,416 reviews (1,359 up · 57 down) · 96% positive Jun 2022 · 1,355 reviews (1,303 up · 52 down) · 96% positive Jul 2022 · 1,677 reviews (1,602 up · 75 down) · 96% positive Aug 2022 · 1,248 reviews (1,201 up · 47 down) · 96% positive Sep 2022 · 1,118 reviews (1,066 up · 52 down) · 95% positive Oct 2022 · 1,222 reviews (1,159 up · 63 down) · 95% positive Nov 2022 · 2,124 reviews (2,042 up · 82 down) · 96% positive Dec 2022 · 1,762 reviews (1,689 up · 73 down) · 96% positive Jan 2023 · 2,297 reviews (2,183 up · 114 down) · 95% positive Feb 2023 · 1,679 reviews (1,507 up · 172 down) · 90% positive Mar 2023 · 1,469 reviews (1,391 up · 78 down) · 95% positive Apr 2023 · 1,442 reviews (1,370 up · 72 down) · 95% positive May 2023 · 1,772 reviews (1,656 up · 116 down) · 93% positive Jun 2023 · 1,354 reviews (1,248 up · 106 down) · 92% positive Jul 2023 · 1,990 reviews (1,838 up · 152 down) · 92% positive Aug 2023 · 1,228 reviews (1,160 up · 68 down) · 94% positive Sep 2023 · 1,592 reviews (1,501 up · 91 down) · 94% positive Oct 2023 · 1,297 reviews (1,229 up · 68 down) · 95% positive Nov 2023 · 2,347 reviews (2,264 up · 83 down) · 96% positive Dec 2023 · 1,665 reviews (1,563 up · 102 down) · 94% positive Jan 2024 · 1,385 reviews (1,321 up · 64 down) · 95% positive Feb 2024 · 1,229 reviews (1,159 up · 70 down) · 94% positive Mar 2024 · 1,595 reviews (1,486 up · 109 down) · 93% positive Apr 2024 · 1,283 reviews (1,221 up · 62 down) · 95% positive May 2024 · 1,280 reviews (1,170 up · 110 down) · 91% positive Jun 2024 · 1,144 reviews (1,046 up · 98 down) · 91% positive Jul 2024 · 1,270 reviews (1,192 up · 78 down) · 94% positive Aug 2024 · 1,120 reviews (1,077 up · 43 down) · 96% positive Sep 2024 · 1,038 reviews (1,000 up · 38 down) · 96% positive Oct 2024 · 1,208 reviews (1,144 up · 64 down) · 95% positive Nov 2024 · 1,937 reviews (1,851 up · 86 down) · 96% positive Dec 2024 · 1,565 reviews (1,508 up · 57 down) · 96% positive Jan 2025 · 1,339 reviews (1,279 up · 60 down) · 96% positive Feb 2025 · 1,019 reviews (964 up · 55 down) · 95% positive Mar 2025 · 1,282 reviews (1,232 up · 50 down) · 96% positive Apr 2025 · 1,449 reviews (1,276 up · 173 down) · 88% positive May 2025 · 1,313 reviews (1,184 up · 129 down) · 90% positive Jun 2025 · 969 reviews (898 up · 71 down) · 93% positive Jul 2025 · 1,130 reviews (1,065 up · 65 down) · 94% positive Aug 2025 · 1,109 reviews (1,050 up · 59 down) · 95% positive Sep 2025 · 948 reviews (905 up · 43 down) · 95% positive Oct 2025 · 1,215 reviews (1,148 up · 67 down) · 94% positive Nov 2025 · 1,763 reviews (1,719 up · 44 down) · 98% positive Dec 2025 · 1,320 reviews (1,270 up · 50 down) · 96% positive Jan 2026 · 1,368 reviews (1,301 up · 67 down) · 95% positive Feb 2026 · 1,092 reviews (1,025 up · 67 down) · 94% positive Mar 2026 · 1,012 reviews (958 up · 54 down) · 95% positive Apr 2026 · 1,174 reviews (1,125 up · 49 down) · 96% positive May 2026 · 1,120 reviews (1,052 up · 68 down) · 94% positive Jun 2026 · 1,350 reviews (1,232 up · 118 down) · 91% positive Jul 2026 · 1,100 reviews (1,025 up · 75 down) · 93% positive Aug 2026 · 451 reviews (416 up · 35 down) · 92% positive

monthly share rated positive · 50% reference · months with <5 reviews faded

the timeline as a table
Reviews per month, all languages; months with no reviews are left out.
month reviews up down positive note
Nov 2019 14,398 13,334 1,064 93%
Dec 2019 6,830 6,309 521 92%
Jan 2020 4,003 3,661 342 91%
Feb 2020 3,455 3,228 227 93%
Mar 2020 3,720 3,361 359 90%
Apr 2020 4,680 4,376 304 94%
May 2020 3,543 3,326 217 94%
Jun 2020 2,350 2,208 142 94%
Jul 2020 2,994 2,869 125 96%
Aug 2020 1,990 1,935 55 97%
Sep 2020 1,828 1,754 74 96%
Oct 2020 1,869 1,818 51 97%
Nov 2020 3,575 3,458 117 97%
Dec 2020 3,047 2,949 98 97%
Jan 2021 3,432 3,287 145 96%
Feb 2021 2,399 2,255 144 94%
Mar 2021 2,030 1,914 116 94%
Apr 2021 2,454 2,314 140 94%
May 2021 1,808 1,740 68 96%
Jun 2021 1,760 1,689 71 96%
Jul 2021 2,048 1,933 115 94%
Aug 2021 2,090 1,970 120 94%
Sep 2021 1,716 1,625 91 95%
Oct 2021 1,994 1,865 129 94%
Nov 2021 2,662 2,579 83 97%
Dec 2021 1,625 1,562 63 96%
Jan 2022 1,842 1,758 84 95%
Feb 2022 1,525 1,445 80 95%
Mar 2022 1,222 1,177 45 96%
Apr 2022 1,869 1,794 75 96%
May 2022 1,416 1,359 57 96%
Jun 2022 1,355 1,303 52 96%
Jul 2022 1,677 1,602 75 96%
Aug 2022 1,248 1,201 47 96%
Sep 2022 1,118 1,066 52 95%
Oct 2022 1,222 1,159 63 95%
Nov 2022 2,124 2,042 82 96%
Dec 2022 1,762 1,689 73 96%
Jan 2023 2,297 2,183 114 95%
Feb 2023 1,679 1,507 172 90%
Mar 2023 1,469 1,391 78 95%
Apr 2023 1,442 1,370 72 95%
May 2023 1,772 1,656 116 93%
Jun 2023 1,354 1,248 106 92%
Jul 2023 1,990 1,838 152 92%
Aug 2023 1,228 1,160 68 94%
Sep 2023 1,592 1,501 91 94%
Oct 2023 1,297 1,229 68 95%
Nov 2023 2,347 2,264 83 96%
Dec 2023 1,665 1,563 102 94%
Jan 2024 1,385 1,321 64 95%
Feb 2024 1,229 1,159 70 94%
Mar 2024 1,595 1,486 109 93%
Apr 2024 1,283 1,221 62 95%
May 2024 1,280 1,170 110 91%
Jun 2024 1,144 1,046 98 91%
Jul 2024 1,270 1,192 78 94%
Aug 2024 1,120 1,077 43 96%
Sep 2024 1,038 1,000 38 96%
Oct 2024 1,208 1,144 64 95%
Nov 2024 1,937 1,851 86 96%
Dec 2024 1,565 1,508 57 96%
Jan 2025 1,339 1,279 60 96%
Feb 2025 1,019 964 55 95%
Mar 2025 1,282 1,232 50 96%
Apr 2025 1,449 1,276 173 88%
May 2025 1,313 1,184 129 90%
Jun 2025 969 898 71 93%
Jul 2025 1,130 1,065 65 94%
Aug 2025 1,109 1,050 59 95%
Sep 2025 948 905 43 95%
Oct 2025 1,215 1,148 67 94%
Nov 2025 1,763 1,719 44 98%
Dec 2025 1,320 1,270 50 96%
Jan 2026 1,368 1,301 67 95%
Feb 2026 1,092 1,025 67 94%
Mar 2026 1,012 958 54 95%
Apr 2026 1,174 1,125 49 96%
May 2026 1,120 1,052 68 94%
Jun 2026 1,350 1,232 118 91%
Jul 2026 1,100 1,025 75 93%
Aug 2026 451 416 35 92%

How this report was made

Population
all Steam reviews of the game (every language, purchase type, and verdict), walked newest-first per window; only English-language reviews are analyzed
Sample
429 English reviews, time-proportional draw over 82 windows (newest-first within each), taken from an all-language walk and kept English-only — where English is a minority the sample runs smaller than the draw, and every margin of error is computed at 429
Aspect yield
164 of 429 analyzed reviews carry at least one aspect (38.2%); every share on this page divides by all 429
Interval regime
calm: standard margins of error for a share of a sample (Wilson interval), no widening needed
Fetch paths
82 time windows fetched directly (windowed)
Language mix
1,000 fetched: english 431 · spanish 226 · brazilian 69 · 21 more
Steam-marked windows
none flagged by Steam (Valve's off-topic flagging began March 2019)
Marked share
0.0% of sample inside marked windows, under the 2% floor
Narrative
passed the grounding gate after one corrective retry
Evidence floor
aspects and emergent themes appear only with 5+ supporting reviews; smaller counts sit at the classifier's false-positive floor
Instrument readings
measured once on the study corpus for this model and prompt: frozen calibration, not properties of this run
· aspect tagging vs. human labels
0.766 [0.713–0.811] (F1 against a human-labeled test set; 1.0 is best)
· quotes filed under the wrong aspect
11.6% [6.6–19.6] of quotes, measured by hand on a sample; lower is better
· independent model vs. production labels
0.791 [0.772–0.810] (F1 of the production labeler against an independent judge model)
Versions
deepseek-v4-flash · prompt classify-v1 · ontology v2
Run
serve-20260817T204353Z-5e928cff · code ca621b8

full methodology in the milestone write-ups